Entertainment
19 min read
Timothy Busfield Prosecutor Rejects Lie Detector, Cites Reoffense Risk
Deadline
January 20, 2026•2 days ago

AI-Generated SummaryAuto-generated
A prosecutor argued Timothy Busfield could "reoffend" against child sexual abuse accusations. The defense countered, claiming children denied abuse initially and that the prosecution relies on unproven allegations. Busfield's lie detector results were deemed irrelevant by the prosecutor, who sought his pretrial detention. The defense emphasized a studio investigation and questioned the accusers' motives.
“It’s not uncommon that the kids did not disclose at that time, or were ready to disclose at that time to a police officer that showed up at their home,” said Bernalillo County Assistant District Attorney Savannah Brandenburg-Koch today in a New Mexico court of child sexual abuse accusations against Timothy Busfield. The Thirtysomething actor is alleged to have repeatedly touched the “‘poop’ and ‘pee’ area” of a young boy who was an actor on the Albuquerque-filmed The Cleaning Lady.
“He does have the likelihood that he could reoffend,” the prosecutor declared of the 68-year-old Busfield, who was sitting nearby in District Judge David A. Murray’s Albuquerque courtroom. Brandenburg-Koch on Tuesday, as DA David Bergman’s office has in court filings over the past week, stressed past but never charged allegations in 1994 and 2012 against Busfield, as well as another claim of over 30 years ago that came to light on January 14. All of the previous claims involved teenage girls and adult women.
“I have significant concerns about the prosecution talking as if he has already been convicted,” defense lawyer Christopher Dodd replied in his own presentation Tuesday, calling the DA’s efforts “a fallacy.” Hitting back hard, Dodd went on to say the children “flat out denied” there was any sexual abuse in their first conversation with police. “The fact is the criminal complaint in this case is slanted.”
RELATED: Timothy Busfield Faces New Sexual Abuse Claim
To that, Dodd called one witness Tuesday, Cleaning Lady director of cinematography Alan Caudillo. The filmmaker had written a letter to the court in Busfield’s favor. The correspondence was included with the defense’s rejection of the DA’s motion.
Praising Busfield’s skills as a director on the episodes of the Elodie Yung-led drama over several seasons, Caudillo today in court called the boys’ parents “typical aggressive set parents.” He also said the father sometimes made him “uncomfortable” and that he heard the parents “took it very badly” when his children, who were being paid $60,000 an episode, were let go from the show. When asked about the core claims of abuse, which he said he read on Deadline last week, The Hangover vet replied with a blunt “no,” when asked by attorney Dodd if “it was possible Mr. Busfield inappropriately touched SL on the set of The Cleaning Lady.”
Having written to the court late last week on the virtues of her husband, Melissa Gilbert was in the courtroom today with other members of the family for the hearing. Being held without bond at the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center, Busfield looked over to her as he entered the room just at 1 p.m. PT. Dressed in the standard prison wear of an orange jumpsuit and shackled, Busfield immediately sat down with his Albuquerque attorneys Amber Fayerberg and Dodd.
RELATED: ‘Thirtysomething’ Castmates Offer Strong Support
Reading over documents in front of him and sipping water, Busfield’s hands were clearly shaking in the opening minutes in a relatively silent courtroom before the judge entered. Judge Murray is expected to rule on the pretrial detention motion during today’s hearing.
Slamming the “minimal investigation” that The Cleaning Lady producer Warner Bros. conducted when allegations were first made in 2024 against Busfield, Assistant DA Brandenburg-Koch sought to dismiss the relevance of lie detector test Busfield successfully passed just before he surrendered himself to New Mexico police. “Polygraph, although allowed here in New Mexico, I would ask the board give less weight to because we don’t have raw data,” she said. “Defendant didn’t provide us with that, and the polygraph does not address what this hearing is about.”
Aiming to keep the currently-incarcerated Busfield behind bars on the vile claims while the case works its way towards trial, Brandenburg-Koch also added that “80% of children delay disclosure … it’s also very normal that kids give a little bit at a time to test the waters to see what happens.” With the thirtysomething actor and The Cleaning Lady director sitting nearby, the prosecutor told District Judge David A. Murray that the “state is requesting that this Court find the defendant dangerous and that there are no conditions of release that the court can impose to secure the safety of the community.”
RELATED: Timothy Busfield’s Mugshot Released
Following a detailed arrest warrant issued January 9 that charged the Busfield with two counts of criminal sexual contact with a minor and child abuse, lawyers for the Emmy winner have questioned how the 2014-born brothers and ex-The Cleaning Lady actors only spoke of tickling and such touching in initial interviews with police and other authorities. It wasn’t until September of last year, months after the Albuquerque Police Department had begun what was turning into a non-starter of an investigation into claims against Busfield, the mother of the boys told the cops that “on 09/02/2025, SL reported to his counselor that Busfield “touched his penis and bottom.”
In a November 3, 2025 phone interview with Brown that is quoted in the January 9 warrant, Busfield told APD Officer Marvin Brown “the lead actress, Elodie Yung” told him back in late 2024 that “the mother of SL and VL (sic) that she wanted revenge, and I’m going to get my revenge on Tim Busfield for not bringing her kids back for the final season.”
Maintaining the family’s motivation was “all about money,” as the Assistant DA herself termed it Tuesday, the defense in their opposition to prosecutors’ pretrial detention motion proclaimed the DA’s office “offers no reliable proof—only allegations advanced by witnesses with documented histories of fraud and financial exploitation, contradicted by a comprehensive studio investigation, and refuted by witnesses and objective risk assessments.”
RELATED: Timothy Busfield Dropped By Innovative Artists
Today, under questioning from Judge Murray on the suspicious move of the parents talking to lawyers before going to the authorities in 2024, Brandenburg-Koch said that no civil lawsuit has been filed. Stating “this is not about the parents history, she added that “it is my understanding that they are not filing a civil lawsuit.”
Rate this article
Login to rate this article
Comments
Please login to comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
