Politics
5 min read
McCallum Brothers Investigated by DoC for Pakiri Protected Coral Breaches
NZ Herald
January 20, 2026•2 days ago

AI-Generated SummaryAuto-generated
McCallum Brothers is under investigation by the Department of Conservation for alleged breaches of the Wildlife Act concerning the disturbance of protected stony corals at Pakiri. The company faces potential penalties for taking or disturbing absolutely protected marine wildlife and failing to report injuries. This investigation occurs as McCallum Brothers seeks approval for significant sand extraction in Bream Bay, a proposal facing environmental opposition.
DoC Border and Species Trade manager Ben Cornelius confirmed the company was being investigated for two alleged breaches of the Wildlife Act 1953: taking or disturbing absolutely protected marine wildlife without authority; and failing to report accidental or incidental death or injury of marine wildlife.
The stony corals involved – kionotrochus suteri and sphenotrochus ralphae – are rare species found only along the northeast coast of Northland, including Pakiri and Bream Bay.
Their limited distribution and role as natural filter‑feeders make them ecologically significant.
If proven, the first alleged offence carries penalties for companies of $800 to $300,000, depending on whether DoC pursues a criminal prosecution. Fines of $600 to $10,000 apply similarly to the second alleged offence.
McCallum Group’s chief operating officer Shayne Elstob acknowledged the allegations, saying they were made by a private party to DoC and had not been admitted by the company.
“MBL have responded to an enquiry from DoC about the allegation and at this stage has nothing further to add,” Elstob said.
The investigation comes at a critical time for McCallum Brothers, which is seeking Government approval through the Fast Track process to extract more than 8 million cubic metres of sand from Bream Bay - a proposal drawing strong community and environmental opposition over risks to sensitive marine habitats.
DoC would not comment further while the investigation remained active, but expected to confirm an outcome in the next few months.
Rate this article
Login to rate this article
Comments
Please login to comment
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
