RTI Response Sparks Scrutiny Over Bryan Acheampong's Military Service

Hello, Sign up to get started Terms and conditions The following terms and conditions apply if you want to submit content (articles, photos, adverts, etc.) to GhanaWeb: You are only allowed to submit content which you have created yourself. You are not allowed to upload photos from another person pretending it is you. No nudity, pornography and any unlawful content is permitted. You grant GhanaWeb the right to publish and use your content. You allow GhanaWeb to communicate with you using the info you provide. GhanaWeb reserves the right to reject/remove your content without explanation. Politics of Monday, 19 January 2026 Source: www.ghanaweb.com RTI response raises serious questions over Bryan Acheampong’s military service claims « Prev Next » Comments (0) Listen to Article Share: An official response from Parliament, issued under Ghana’s Right to Information Act, has raised significant questions regarding claims of military service attributed to Member of Parliament for Mpraeso, Dr Bryan Acheampong, one of the five contenders in the New Patriotic Party’s (NPP) flagbearer race scheduled for 31 January 2026. The disclosure follows a formal Right to Information (RTI) request submitted on November 4, 2025, to the Clerk to Parliament, seeking clarification on whether Parliament received any documentation from Dr Bryan Acheampong confirming alleged service in the United States Air Force or any related branch of the United States Armed Forces. No record of any military service documentation In a written response signed by the Clerk to Parliament, Ebenezer Ahumah Djietror, Parliament stated unequivocally that: ● There is no record that Hon. Bryan Acheampong submitted details of any rank of enlistment or discharge from the United States Air Force or any other branch of the US Armed Forces. ● Parliament did not receive any Certificate of Honorable Discharge or any other documentation confirming such service. ● As a result, Parliament is unable to provide certified copies or particulars of anyalleged military service, since no such documentation was ever presented. The response was issued in compliance with the Right to Information Act, 2019 (Act 989) and represents Parliament’s official position on the matter. >b>Potential legal consequences if Parliament acts further Legal analysts note that the implications of the RTI response extend beyond political optics. Under Ghanaian law, statements made to Parliament or relied upon during vetting and parliamentary proceedings carry legal weight. Should Parliament decide to formally pursue the matter, and should it be established that false representations were made under oath or in official proceedings, such a finding could potentially amount to perjury, an offence punishable under Ghana’s criminal law. Any such determination would be contingent on parliamentary inquiry and due process, but the RTI response provides a factual baseline that could trigger further institutional action. Heightened scrutiny ahead of NPP flagbearer election The revelation comes at a sensitive time for the NPP, as internal contestation intensifies ahead of the party’s presidential primary. Dr Bryan Acheampong is one of five aspirants seeking to lead the party into the 2028 general elections. With delegates increasingly focused on credibility, integrity, and eligibility, the issue isexpected to attract heightened scrutiny both within the party and in the broader public space. No finding of guilt, but questions remain It is important to note that the RTI response does not constitute a finding of wrongdoing against Dr Bryan Acheampong. It merely confirms that Parliament has no official record of the military service documentation in question. However, the absence of such records, now formally acknowledged by Parliament, raises questions that may not easily dissipate, particularly if Parliament, civil society, or political actors elect to pursue the matter further. As the flagbearer contest approaches, how these questions are addressed may prove consequential for both the aspirant. Meanwhile, watch as Ghanaians respond to Ofori-Atta's detention Comments: This article has no comments yet, be the first to comment